독자들은 AI 라벨이 공개되기 전까지 ChatGPT 이야기를 인간 작가의 작품보다 선호
2,500명을 대상으로 한 연구에 따르면 독자들은 chatgpt 단편 소설을 인간이 쓴 작품보다 품질이 더 높다고 평가했지만, AI 작품임이 공개되자 평가가 곤두박질쳤다. 이는 기계 창작에 대한 뚜렷한 편견을 드러낸다.
a study published in the journal judgment and decision making analyzed the reactions of 2,587 participants who read six short stories, half written by humans and half generated by chatgpt-4. when the source was blinded, ai stories received significantly higher mean scores for quality (1.54 vs 0.97) and immersion (1.42 vs 1.00) than human texts, likely because ai writing is smoother and easier to process. however, the experiments revealed a robust 'ai labeling effect': when participants were told a story was ai-generated, their ratings dropped, and when told it was human-written, ratings rose, regardless of the actual origin. furthermore, ai skeptics rated stories lower when told they were ai-generated, while ai enthusiasts rated them higher, yet no group could reliably identify the stories' origins better than chance when tested directly.