读者偏好 ChatGPT 故事胜过人类作者，但在得知 AI 标签后态度反转
一项针对 2500 名参与者的研究发现，读者在未知来源时给 ChatGPT 短篇小说的质量评分高于人类作品，但一旦得知 AI 身份评分便会骤降，揭示了人们对机器创作的明显偏见。
a study published in the journal judgment and decision making analyzed the reactions of 2,587 participants who read six short stories, half written by humans and half generated by chatgpt-4. when the source was blinded, ai stories received significantly higher mean scores for quality (1.54 vs 0.97) and immersion (1.42 vs 1.00) than human texts, likely because ai writing is smoother and easier to process. however, the experiments revealed a robust 'ai labeling effect': when participants were told a story was ai-generated, their ratings dropped, and when told it was human-written, ratings rose, regardless of the actual origin. furthermore, ai skeptics rated stories lower when told they were ai-generated, while ai enthusiasts rated them higher, yet no group could reliably identify the stories' origins better than chance when tested directly.