馬斯克訴奧特曼審判凸顯OpenAI未能維護公共利益
馬斯克訴奧特曼案結束結案陳詞，透露雙方都將AGI主導地位置於非營利使命之上，而非造福人類。
the musk v. altman trial concluded with closing arguments centering on whether openai adhered to its founding nonprofit mission or became a vehicle for personal enrichment and agi dominance. testimony revealed that musk and altman were aligned on creating a capped-profit entity to rival google deepmind, viewing the nonprofit structure as an inconvenient hurdle. former openai researchers and safety groups filed amicus briefs arguing that the proposed for-profit conversion undermines the mission to ensure agi benefits all of humanity. legal experts noted that the public is the ultimate loser in the dispute, as the trial treated the nonprofit merely as a corporate investor rather than a steward of public safety. a judgment is expected as soon as next week.