法院推翻亞馬遜對Perplexity代理的禁令
美國一家上訴法院推翻了阻止Perplexity的AI代理在亞馬遜上運行的禁令，裁定是用戶而非AI在訪問平台。該決定為AI代理的合法性確立了先例。
the 9th us circuit court of appeals overturned a preliminary injunction that barred perplexity from operating its ai shopping agents on amazon, determining that users accessing their own accounts via agents does not constitute fraud by the startup. the court rejected amazon's argument that the ai company was the one accessing the computer without authorization, a distinction that validates the 'user attribution' defense for agentic ai. amazon, which called the agents a security risk and accused perplexity of ignoring cease-and-desist orders, stated it is evaluating next steps while the underlying lawsuit proceeds. this ruling establishes a critical precedent for the emerging agent economy, defining the legal boundary between automated tools and unauthorized computer access.