뮌헨 법원, 페어유즈 기각…Suno에 저작권 침해 책임
뮌헨 법원은 Suno가 특정 곡들을 학습하고 재현함으로써 저작권을 침해했다며 페어유즈(fair use) 항변을 기각하는 판결을 내렸습니다. 이는 유럽에서 AI 학습 책임에 관한 선례를 만듭니다.
a munich court ruled in favor of german rights group gema, finding that suno models reproduced specific original elements from training songs, constituting copyright infringement. the court rejected suno's defense that it only stores mathematical patterns, finding that memorization occurred and applying us law to reject fair use protection. the court placed liability solely on suno, stating its model selection and architecture 'substantively determined' the infringing outputs. this ruling contradicts some us precedents like bartz, distinguishing them on the grounds that suno's outputs were 'substantially similar' to the originals. the decision could force ai music companies to alter their architectures or licensing strategies if upheld on appeal.